Notes on the Sexual Abuse Crisis
Having spent 28 days reflecting on a few of the manifold graces I’ve known as a Catholic Christian, I cannot allow Lent to pass without noting and offering some thoughts on the sexual abuse crisis that continues to afflict the Catholic Church.
I write “afflict the Catholic Church” not out of any sense of defensiveness, much less in an effort to point an accusing finger at the media. Rather, I am conscious that these horrible sins – both the original abuse committed by priests, as well as the criminal negligence demonstrated by bishops and other ecclesiastical authorities – have been committed against the Body of Christ, which is the Church. They have been attacks upon the bodies, souls and faith of Catholics, 99.7% of whom are members of the lay faithful. They have also been a crime against Jesus Christ, who suffers new agonies in the person of each and every victim of sexual abuse (Matthew 25:40). Abuser priests and criminal bishops may never have to face their victims again, but they will not escape the scrutiny of Christ, the Just Judge, who divides sheep from goats according to their works.
Here’s what the sexual abuse crisis is NOT:
It is not a conspiracy by the “liberal” media. If anything, the media has shown remarkable deference to the Church over the years. It is true that most reporters are not Catholic, and it is also true that there are some who seem to have an axe to grind with the Church (although most of those are typically Catholics or ex-Catholics); but there is simply no ground for claiming that this crisis was fabricated or exacerbated by the media.
The sexual abuse crisis is also not about homosexuality in the priesthood. It is true that original acts of sexual abuse, at least in the United States, had an overwhelmingly homosexual character. This was due to a number of factors, including the fact that the celibate priesthood has historically been an attractive vocation for homosexual men who wished to channel their conflicted desires into service to the Church. This may have even been true of St. Paul, who never married and who complained bitterly in Scripture about a “thorn in the flesh” that he asked three times to have removed by God. Whatever the reason, there is no evidence that homosexual men are more likely than heterosexuals to prey on children and young people. Priests are called to be faithful to their vows and the celibacy requirement of the priesthood. With self-control and the aid of grace the vast majority of priests – homosexual and heterosexual – are able to fulfill their promise.
The crisis is not about celibacy. There is plenty of sexual abuse in other institutions, none of which impose a rule of celibacy. Marriage is available for scoutmasters, teachers, camp counselors, rabbis, ministers, policemen, physicians, and dentists, all professions in which rates of sexual abuse are higher than the norm. In fact, the average child molester in America is married, educated, and employed. The New York City school system averages one student complaint of sexual abuse every day, and yet teachers and staff are able to marry. In a now-famous survey conducted in the 1980’s, some 35% of Protestant ministers admitted to illicit sexual contact with a parishioner during their tenure. The fact is that all Christians are called to chastity, in whatever their state. Married men and women are to be faithful to their spouses. Single men and women are to eschew fornication. The same is true for priests.
The sexual abuse crisis is not about the Catholic faith. There are those both inside and outside the Church who would like to use the crisis to undermine that faith. Atheists will suggest that there is something about religion in general, or Christianity in particular, that lends itself to this sort of behavior. Anti-Catholic Christians will dishonestly attribute the crisis to one distinctive Catholic doctrine or another. Dissenters inside the Church will take the opportunity of the crisis to push their theological agendas, which – irony of ironies – typically have to do with loosening Church teaching on sexual morality. The fact is that no one has ever made a convincing case that any article of the Creed – including the invocation of “one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church – causes a man to rape a child. Those who imply or make such an accusation remind me of a crack made by the writer G.K. Chesterton. “When a man claims to doubt the validity of the hypostatic union (the doctrine that Christ is fully divine and fully human), he usually means that he’s sleeping with his neighbor’s wife.” In other words, there’s another agenda at work.
Most controversially, I would say that the crisis isn’t even fundamentally about sexually abusive priests! There have always been corrupt, wayward, dishonest, or lustful clergy and religious. The “John Jay Report,” commissioned by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, conducted by the John Jay College of Criminal Justice and released in 2004, is the most extensive study of sexual abuse in the Catholic Church. The Report revealed that over a 50 year period, 1.5% of American priests had credible accusations made against them. Satistically, that is not an inordinate number for the profession, which suggests that there is not a causal connection between the priesthood and sexual abuse. Let me be clear: I am not excusing offenders. Far from it. I rejoice every time one of these slugs is tried and convicted of a crime, or removed from the active ministry following an ecclesiastical investigation. But the awful thing about this crisis isn’t that the occasional priestly pederast surfaced. It is that those pederasts were tolerated, even enabled, and that as a result most offenders had many victims – hundreds in some cases – and exercised their predation over long stretches of time. All of which leads me to what the crisis is really all about.
The sexual abuse crisis in the Catholic Church is fundamentally about the arrogance of bishops. It is an institutional crisis among those shepherds specifically charged with governing, teaching, and sanctifying the faithful entrusted to them.
In their arrogance, bishops thought they could protect their reputations and the reputation of the Church by playing a shell game with abusive priests. And so, they shuttled these men from one parish to another, apparently giving no thought to the damaged bodies and souls left behind, or the new victims that would inevitably appear. They crushed those in their own chanceries who dared to challenge their handling of these matters. They ignored the cries of victims and the good faith inquiries of third parties. They stonewalled the media, police, and district attorneys. They sicced their lawyers on critics. In some cases they even lied to Rome or to their brother bishops. And when finally cornered, they appropriated for themselves the mantle of victim.
In their ignorance, bishops chose to believe professional therapists who told them that the problem wasn’t ‘sin’ but ‘sickness, and that pederasts could be “cured” by a few months of therapeutic retreat. And so, they sent them away, paid their bills, and then welcomed them back. In their incompetence, bishops believed the lawyers who recommended what lawyers always recommend: limit the damage at all costs. And so they tried to ignore the pleas of victims, erecting a wall between themselves and their needy, aching faithful. Then, when victims could no longer be avoided, they cut backroom deals, cash deals, with side agreements about confidentiality – silence – and limited future liability. They thought and behaved like CEO’s, not shepherds; petty tyrants, not loving fathers; administrators, not mediators of grace.
What should happen now? First, we need to begin talking about it. Weeks, months go by and nothing is ever mentioned in our parishes. It’s as if this is happening on another planet, to another church. I don’t mean that we should remand the subject to religious education, or put everyone through idiotic classes on “sexual harassment.” I do mean that pastors and bishops should talk to the lay faithful about what went on, how it was wrong, and how things are going to be different. They need to do this with humility and honesty, really listening to people for once. They themselves need to become the crosses on which people can crucify their anger and confusion, their doubt and cynicism.
Second, any bishop or priest directly implicated in the cover-up should resign immediately. There will be time for confession and absolution, for prayer and penance. What is most important is that offenders – and by that I mean not sexual abusers, but episcopal criminals – remove themselves or be removed from positions of leadership. Quite frankly, if there is convincing evidence that he knowingly shuttled a sexual abuser from one parish to another, then even Pope Benedict XVI should step down, something that has happened many times in Church history. It will be his prerogative, of course, because no power can remove from office the man who exercises “supreme, full, immediate, and universal ordinary power.” But for the sake of the Church, the Faith, the Gospel, and Christ Himself, the former Archbishop of Munich should resign if guilty. Moreover, if the Holy Father or any other bishop is guilty of breaching the criminal law, he should be prosecuted and, if convicted, jailed.
Third, the Church must find a better means of identifying, selecting, naming and empowering bishops. The fact is that most bishops are organizational yes-men, often chancery bureaucrats or glad-handing monsignori. They come to the attention of the Church not because of their personal holiness, teaching prowess or preaching ability, but because they have proven themselves to be effective managers, fundraisers, ecclesial executives. Once named bishops, these men are then moved around like marbles on a Chinese checkerboard, which only makes them more detached from the laity and more dependent on chancery “experts” who give them bad advice.
Finally, our hearts and hands must turn to the victims of sexual abuse and their families. They are our brothers and sisters, and we owe them prayer, love, understanding, and support. Many of them will never again darken the door of a church. Others are sitting in the pew next to us. In every case, we need to see Christ in them, and recognize that in their suffering He is crucified over and over again. For love of Him we must love them.
Napoleon Bonaparte once expressed the desire to crush the Catholic Church, which was frustrating his plans for hegemony over all of Europe. Upon hearing Napoleon’s desire, Cardinal Consalvi replied “If in 1,800 years we clergy have failed to destroy the Church, do you really think that you’ll be able to do it?” The more things change, the more they stay the same. Once again, Satan is sifting the Catholic clergy like wheat. We need to join with the overwhelming majority of faithful, holy priests to strengthen our brothers and sisters. Talk about the Catholic Church “surviving,” is ridiculous. Not only is the Catholic Church the 2000 year-old bedrock of Western Civilization, it operates under a divine guarantee that “the gates of Hell shall not prevail against it.” The Church is going nowhere, but it is reforming, as it always must be.
“We adore you, O Christ, and we praise you because by your Holy Cross you have redeemed the world.”